Economic Survey 2011 asks IT industry

India’s future in information technology outsourcing will be determined by how it addresses challenges that arise from increasing competition and infrastructure demands, revealed the Economic Survey 2010-11.
The Economic Survey was presented in the Parliament on Friday by Union Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee.
The annual report said that though India remains a key player in global information technology outsourcing, the country is likely to experience a setback unless the competitive aspects are adequately addressed to.
The report also put an accent on the competition from other major business process outsourcing countries. In addition, the report also cited protectionist attitude of countries like Britain where they have policies to employ locals.

ancial year 2010-11, the country will witness broad-based growth across mature and emerging verticals, forecasts Nasscom, which represents the tone of public policy for the country’s software industry.

The overall IT revenue of Indian software industry for 2010-11 will be expected to go up to $76.1 billion from $63.7 billion of the previous year. This growth is in tune with that of the previous years since 2004-5 and implies a compound annual growth rate of 22.5 per cent.

2010-11 also saw the industry grow by 19.5 per cent in contrast to 6.2 per cent growth of the preceding year.

SOFTWARE QUALITY CONTROL PROCEDURE

A SOFTWARE QUALITY CONTROL PROCEDURE :
For in house inspection during software product developement


ABSTRACT


the developpemnt of software systems involves a series of productionactivities where opportunities for injection of human gallibilities are enormous.erros may begin to occur at the very inception of the process. becouse of these erros, software developpemnt is to be accompagnied by quality control models at each and every stage of the developpemnt. in this paper an attemp has been made to scintillate and highlight the control tools for in house inspection during the software product develloppement. tables are designed and contructed to select the parametres of sampling tools which will be a benefict for software quality control professionals.


1.0 INTRODUCTION


the major factors demands on software engeneers are requirement identification and compliance, variability reduction during the process, control of numbers of errors during devellopement, design adequacy, system faillure analysis, cost control and delivering products on time. errors may begin to occur at the every stage of developpemtnt. according to pressman (1997), becouse of these erros, software devellopent process is to be accompanied by quality assurances models. glen myers(1979) states a numbers of objectives for the developpement of quality oriented software.
in the modern computing area, different modules are developped at various offshore and integrated at the final stage. a particular module will have several functions to be develloped and deployed. the problems face by software engenneers is critic in this stage.


2.0 FORMULTION AND ALGORITHM FOR THE REJECTION OF THE MODULE


let x be the numbers of errors in a given module. then there are statistical evidences for x to following poisson or binomial probability model.


n = numbers of sample functions to be chosen from a lot modules.
p = process fractional errors
k = numbers of erros in the sample which my lead to rejection of the module
then the probabiliy of rejection of the module due to poisson model is give by 


soon

General Information

Computing and Information Sciences


Computing and Information Sciences is a peer reviewed journal that is committed to timely publication of original research, surveying and tutorial contributions on the analysis and development of computing and information science. The journal is designed mainly to serve researchers and developers, dealing with information and computing. Papers that can provide both theoretical analysis, along with carefully designed computational experiments, are particularly welcome. The journal is published 2-3 times per year with distribution to librarians, universities, research centers, researchers in computing, mathematics, and information science. The journal maintains strict refereeing procedures through its editorial policies in order to publish papers of only the highest quality. The refereeing is done by anonymous Reviewers. Often, reviews take four months to six months to obtain, occasionally longer, and it takes an additional several months for the publication process.